The FTSE 250 postal carrier had claimed that the strike ballot by the union had suffered from “potential irregularities”, citing evidence that some CWU members had been pressured to vote in favour of the move.
If the strike had gone ahead, it would have been Royal Mails first national stoppage in ten years and during a critical period for delivery firms.
Responding to the judgment, CWU general secretary Dave Ward said its members were “extremely angry and bitterly disappointed that one judge has granted Royal Mail an injunction to invalidate our ballot for strike action”.
“This injunction is not only a massive injustice to our members its also an injustice to every worker in the country”, he added.
Ofcom fine upheld
However, Royal Mails legal fortunes were not all positive on Wednesday after it failed to overturn a £50mln fine from Ofcom in the Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) for breaking competition rules.
The regulator had originally handed down the penalty last August on the grounds that the firm had abused its position in the market to discriminate against its largest rival, parcel delivery firm Whistl.
“Royal Mail had a special responsibility to ensure its behaviour was not anti-competitive. We hope that our fine, which has been upheld in full by the Tribunal, will ensure that Royal Mail and other powerful companies take their legal duties very seriously”, said Ofcoms spokesman.
In an announcement after the close on Tuesday, Royal Mail said it was “disappointed by the CATs judgement to uphold Ofcoms decision” and was considering whether to appeal the decision.
Fine decision “very negative outcome”, says broker
In a note on Wednesday, broker Peel Hunt said the CTA ruling was “a very negative outcome” for Royal Mail as it not only upheld Ofcoms fine but appeared to support “inevitable legRead More – Source