Britain

PM May – my response to deadly Grenfell fire was not good enough

LONDON (Reuters) – Prime Minister Theresa May said on Monday that her initial response to the Grenfell Tower fire, which killed 71 people in London a year ago, was not good enough because it had given the wrong impression that she didnt care.

FILE PHOTO: Britain's Prime Minister, Theresa May, speaks to police officers as she visits the scene of a tower block which was destroyed in a fire disaster, in north Kensington, West London, Britain June 15, 2017. REUTERS/Peter Nicholls/File Photo

The 24-storey social housing block in west London, home to a close-knit, ethnically diverse community, was engulfed by flames in the middle of the night of June 14, 2017, in Britains deadliest fire on domestic premises since World War Two.

The tragedy, which unfolded within one of Londons richest boroughs, immediately prompted a wave of soul-searching about social inequalities, neglect of immigrant communities and poor safety standards in social housing.

The day after the disaster, May briefly visited the site, thanking firefighters for their work and holding a short meeting with the team in charge of the response.

But her failure to meet any of the traumatised survivors or desperate relatives searching for missing loved ones angered the local community and came to symbolise what many people felt was a history of contempt from the authorities.

FILE PHOTO: Police officers protect the entourage carrying Britain's Prime Minister Theresa May from a crowd of people after she visited a church following the fire that destroyed The Grenfell Tower block, in north Kensington, West London, Britain June 16, 2017. REUTERS/Hannah McKay/File Photo

“It has long been clear that the initial response was not good enough. I include myself in that,” May wrote in a column in the Evening Standard, a London newspaper, days before the first anniversary of the tragedy.

“The residents of Grenfell Tower needed to know that those in power recognised and understood their despair. And I will always regret that by not meeting them that day, it seemed as though I didnt care. That was never the case.”

May did not say why she had not ventured outside the police cordon around the blackened ruin of Grenfell Tower to meet any of the people who were being cared for at a nearby church and in the homes of local residents.

Flames and smoke billow as firefighters deal with a serious fire in the Grenfell Tower apartment block at Latimer Road in West London, Britain June 14, 2017. REUTERS/Toby Melville/File Photo

SLOW RESPONSE

At the time, almost palpable grief and anger were coursing through the neighbourhood. While some people were pasting up improvised missing person notices and creating makeshift memorials, others were giving media interviews in which they blamed local and national government for the disaster.

The head of the local authority of Kensington and Chelsea borough, which owned Grenfell Tower, was forced to resign days later as it became clear the body was failing to provide adequate emergency housing and other services to the survivors.

Some of the survivors have said that the longer term response has been equally poor, with families languishing in inappropriate temporary accommodation for months on end.

“It has taken too long, but of the 203 households in need of a new home, 198 households have now accepted an offer of accommodation, either permanent or temporary,” May wrote.

The causes of the fire are now the subject of a police investigation that could result in criminal charges, and of an independent public inquiry ordered by May.

The inquiry has heard that Grenfell Tower had been enveloped in a combustible cladding during a recent refurbishment, and that this was a major factor in the rapid spread of the fire. [nL5N1T7587]

Reporting by Estelle Shirbon; Editing by Gareth Jones

Original Article

RT

Related Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *